Currently released so far... 5420 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
AE
AJ
ASEC
AMGT
AR
AU
AG
AS
AM
AORC
AFIN
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AL
AEMR
ACOA
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AVERY
APCS
AER
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AEC
APECO
AGMT
CH
CASC
CA
CD
CV
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CU
CBW
CLINTON
CE
CJAN
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CDG
CIS
CM
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CJUS
CARSON
CL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
EPET
EINV
ECON
ENRG
EAID
ETRD
EG
ETTC
EFIN
EU
EAGR
ELAB
EIND
EUN
EAIR
ER
ECIN
ECPS
EFIS
EI
EINT
EZ
EMIN
ET
EC
ECONEFIN
ENVR
ES
ECA
ELN
EN
EFTA
EWWT
ELTN
EXTERNAL
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
EK
ENGY
ETRO
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDEINVTINTCS
ESENV
ENVI
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INTERPOL
IPR
IN
INRB
IAEA
IRAJ
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
ITPHUM
IV
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
INR
IRC
ITALY
ITALIAN
KCOR
KZ
KDEM
KN
KNNP
KPAL
KU
KWBG
KCRM
KE
KISL
KAWK
KSCA
KS
KSPR
KJUS
KFRD
KTIP
KPAO
KTFN
KIPR
KPKO
KNUC
KMDR
KGHG
KPLS
KOLY
KUNR
KDRG
KIRF
KIRC
KBIO
KHLS
KG
KACT
KGIC
KRAD
KCOM
KMCA
KV
KHDP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KMPI
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KOMC
KTLA
KCFC
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KTDB
KMRS
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KSTH
KREL
KNSD
KTEX
KPAI
KHSA
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
MOPS
MARR
MASS
MTCRE
MX
MCAP
MO
MNUC
ML
MR
MZ
MPOS
MOPPS
MTCR
MAPP
MU
MY
MA
MG
MASC
MCC
MEPP
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MASSMNUC
MERCOSUR
MC
ODIP
OIIP
OREP
OVIP
OEXC
OPRC
OFDP
OPDC
OTRA
OSCE
OAS
OPIC
OECD
OPCW
OSCI
OIE
OIC
OTR
OVP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
PGOV
PINR
PREL
PTER
PK
PHUM
PE
PARM
PBIO
PINS
PREF
PSOE
PBTS
PL
PHSA
PKFK
PO
PGOF
PROP
PA
PARMS
PORG
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PRGOV
PNAT
PROV
PEL
PINF
PGOVE
POLINT
PRL
PRAM
PMAR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PHUS
PHUMPREL
PG
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PECON
POGOV
PINL
SCUL
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SU
SW
SOCI
SL
SG
SMIG
SO
SF
SR
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
SNARCS
STEINBERG
TX
TW
TU
TSPA
TH
TIP
TI
TS
TBIO
TRGY
TC
TR
TT
TERRORISM
TO
TFIN
TD
TSPL
TZ
TPHY
TK
TNGD
TINT
TRSY
TP
UK
UG
UP
UV
US
UN
UNSC
UNGA
USEU
USUN
UY
UZ
UNO
UNMIK
UNESCO
UE
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
UNCHC
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 05SANJOSE2158, COSTA RICA: TEXTILE AND APPAREL INDUSTRY
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
 - The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
 - The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
 
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05SANJOSE2158.
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAN JOSE 002158 
 
SIPDIS 
 
WHA/CEN 
EB/TPP/ABT FOR EHEARTNEY 
EB FOR WCRAFT 
BLAMPRON 
E FOR DEDWARDS 
WHA/EPSC FOR KURS 
LGUMBINER 
COMMERCE/ITA/OTEXA FOR MDANDREA 
 
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR RVARGO, NMOORJANI, AHEYLIGER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD ECON KTEX PGOV PREL CS
SUBJECT: COSTA RICA: TEXTILE AND APPAREL INDUSTRY 
 
REF: A. (A) SECSTATE 146213 
     ¶B. (B) SAN JOSE 00678 
 
¶1.  Summary:  The textile industry in Costa Rica is regarded 
as efficient and productive.  However, the low labor costs of 
China and the preferential treatment Mexico was granted under 
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) put the Costa 
Rican textile industry at a disadvantage.  As a result of 
these and other competitive factors, Costa Rican textile 
industry exports declined, and employment in the sector more 
than halved from 1990 through 2004.  In 2001, Caribbean Basin 
Initiative (CBI) nations began realizing the benefits of the 
textile-related provisions of the Caribbean Basin Trade 
Promotion Act (CBTPA).  Although still declining in exports 
and employment, in recent years the Costa Rican textile 
industry has maintained viability by concentrating on niche 
products, leveraging the skills of its efficient workforce, 
and taking advantage of its relative proximity to the U.S. 
market.  End Summary. 
 
-------------------- 
REQUESTED STATISTICS 
-------------------- 
                                    2004*    Jan-Jun 2005* 
 
Total Industrial Production        4,765           2,504 
 
Textile/Apparel Production           630             268 
Share of Total Production (%)       13.2            10.7 
 
Total Imports (M)                  8,300           4,600 
 
Textile/Apparel Imports              588**           288** 
Share of M (%)                       7.1             6.3 
 
 
Total Exports (X)                  6,300           3,400 
 
Textile/Apparel Exports              547             218 
Share of X (%)                       8.7             6.4 
 
Total Work Force               1,654,000       1,654,000 
 
Manufacturing Employment (ME)    230,000         230,000 
 
Textile/Apparel Employment        15,000          15,000 
Share of ME (%)                      6.5             6.5 
 
 
*Source: The Foreign Trade Corporation of Costa Rica 
(PROCOMER) and Council of Textile Quotas, all figures in USD 
millions 
**Based on information provided by the Costa Rican Textile 
Chamber ) includes imports into Free Trade Zones. 
 
¶2.  According to GOCR and industry sources, the total number 
of people directly employed in the textile industry is 
between 11,000 and 15,000.  The GOCR Social Security Agency 
records approximately 11,000 workers in this industry. 
However, industry experts claim at least 15,000 direct jobs, 
as well as another 5,000 jobs that are indirectly tied to the 
textile industry.  There are approximately 67 companies in 
the industry in Costa Rica.  Of the estimated 15,000 
employees, approximately two thirds are employed by four 
large companies including Sara Lee (and its contractors), 
Vanity Fair (VF), Jockey, and Borkar.  Products are varied 
and include suits, casual style pants, knit shirts, 
underwear, and clothes with high tech sport fabrics.  For the 
2004 calendar year, Costa Rica exported USD 546.7 million of 
textiles, of which USD 523 million went to the U.S.  Seventy 
seven percent of total exports to the U.S. used almost 
exclusively U.S. inputs to comply with CBTPA rules. 
 
¶3.  Recent news about loss of textile and apparel jobs 
include the closing of Lovable/Celebrity Co.,s operations by 
the end of September 2005, reportedly due to increased 
competition from China.  Lovable/Celebrity makes women,s 
underwear and is headquartered in Honduras, has operated in 
Costa Rica for 33 years, and, at its peak 20 years ago, 
employed 1,500 workers.  The closing of operations in Costa 
Rica means that 76 workers will have to find other jobs. 
Lovable/Celebrity is moving work to its other facilities in 
Honduras due to the pressure to lower labor costs and the 
fact that Honduras has ratified the United States-Central 
American-Dominican Republic FTA (CAFTA-DR).  A Celebrity 
representative stated that the textile and apparel sector is 
facing many threats in Costa Rica such as the GOCR,s 
indecision about CAFTA-DR.  Another large company, Vanity 
Fair, let 300 workers go in January 2005, and job shedding in 
the industry is likely to continue. 
 
-------------------------- 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 
-------------------------- 
 
¶4.  As requested in Paragraph 5 of Ref A, Post offers the 
following input. 
 
Q1:  Are host country products receiving lower prices due to 
heightened international competition?  Have the manufacturers 
received more, less, or the same number of orders as in years 
past?  Have foreign investors, including Asian investors, 
closed factories or otherwise pulled out of local production? 
 
A1:  Prices in the apparel market are declining not only due 
to the increase in competition, but also because of more 
effective and efficient production processes and the decline 
in prices of raw materials, especially fabric. 
 
In Costa Rica the companies are receiving the same number of 
orders as last year.  However, due to market forces such as 
the above-mentioned influences, the value of textile and 
apparel production is decreasing. 
 
Industry sources say that there have not been any Asian 
investors or Asian-owned textile or apparel manufacturers in 
Costa Rica for several years.  A U.S.-owned producer of 
relatively low-end children,s clothing, Garan, is moving its 
operation to El Salvador and to contractors in China. 
 
¶5.  Q2:  The USG has approved seven safeguards in 2005 to 
restrict the growth of Chinese imports in those product 
categories, and the European Union (EU) has reached an 
agreement with China to limit import growth of certain 
textiles and apparel products.  Have the U.S. safeguards or 
the EU deal affected the export prospects of (Costa Rican) 
manufacturers?  Has your host government implemented, or is 
it considering implementing safeguards or other measures to 
reduce growth of imports of Chinese textiles and apparel 
products into (Costa Rica)? 
 
A2:  In the case of socks, industry experts said the 
safeguards implemented by the U.S. had a positive effect by 
fomenting some uncertainty, at least in the minds of U.S. 
buyers, about the potential supply of products from China. 
That is, since the safeguards potentially limit the 
importation of socks made in China, supply from Costa Rican 
sock suppliers was seen as more reliable.  Industry experts 
also revealed that they have discussed the possibility of 
implementing safeguards in textiles.  However, this is a very 
expensive and time-consuming process in which the sector has 
to prove damages.  Many years ago the Costa Rican Textile 
Chamber, an industry association, tried to make such a case, 
and they were not successful.  Furthermore, the governmental 
agency responsible for reviewing such requests, the Ministry 
of Economy, Industry, and Trade, does not have sufficient 
personnel to perform such reviews.  As a result, neither the 
industry nor the GOCR is thinking about pursuing safeguards 
at this time. 
 
¶6.  Q3:  Has increased global competition affected local 
labor conditions by causing employers to reduce wages, seek 
flexibility from government-required minimum wages, or 
adversely affected union organization? 
 
A3:  Because Costa Rican textile and apparel manufacturers 
have survived due to finding niche products, emphasizing 
efficiency, and employing highly-skilled personnel, neither 
labor standards nor wages have decreased.  Workers are 
relatively well paid, and their standard of living is high 
not only compared to their neighbors in Central America but 
also compared to other countries of the world.  Since the 
majority of exports go to the U.S., labor standards have 
increased due to complying with the standards of labor 
certifications which are required by major U.S. buyers. 
Also, Costa Rica has a relatively strong sense of social 
egalitarianism, and proposals to suppress the minimum wage 
would not be looked upon positively and would be highly 
unlikely to be approved.  Note:  Inflation is currently a 
problem in Costa Rica, and wages are not keeping up.  The 
GOCR mandates the annual percentage increase in private and 
public sector wages and has recently held them to a level 
below the rate of inflation.  Therefore, the real purchasing 
power of workers, wages of is declining.  Although there is 
a union presence in most factories, the operations are 
usually funded by the plant owner and are focused more on 
social issues and activities.  The relationships between 
owners and unions in the textile industry tend to be 
non-confrontational. 
 
¶7.  Q4:  Has the government or private industry taken action 
to increase (Costa Rica,s)competitiveness, such as improving 
infrastructure, reducing bureaucratic requirements, 
developing the textiles (fabric production) industry, moving 
to higher-valued goods, or identifying niche markets.  Does 
Post think that the host government or private industry,s 
strategy will be successful? 
 
A4:  During the 1990s, the Costa Rican textile industry was 
whittled down to those manufacturers that were efficient 
and/or specialized.  Today, the Costa Rican Textile Chamber 
works actively with the Ministry of Foreign Trade (COMEX) and 
Customs to increase the efficacy and efficiency of the 
exporting and importing process.  Customs is currently 
implementing a new registration system for imports, although 
it is not yet up and running.  Reportedly, some technical 
problems have delayed its full use.  The quasi-government 
organization, the National Association of Industrial Textile 
Exporters, works with government and private industry to 
educate them on the different importing/exporting regimens 
such as the Special 807 requirements and, if and when it 
takes effect in Costa Rica, the U.S.-Central 
American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR) 
requirements.  The Textiles Chamber also works with private 
industry companies to upgrade their capabilities and help 
steer them to more efficient methods and more 
customer-friendly services. 
 
Many of the companies in Costa Rica have already found niche 
markets or have begun to offer a broader range of services to 
their customers.  For example, Capas Vaqueros makes GORTEX to 
produce waterproof jackets and garments, one of very few 
companies outside of the U.S. that is authorized to do so. 
Cordero y Chavarria transitioned from only performing cutting 
and trimming services to offering design and manufacturing 
services for exercise wear.  Coloplast started making 
prosthesis bras for women who have had mastectomies and now 
also makes swimwear for the same clientele. 
 
With respect to the survival of the textile and apparel 
industry in Costa Rica, the most productive step the GOCR can 
take is to expeditiously approve CAFTA-DR, which will 
facilitate access to the U.S. market.  Lack of sufficient 
infrastructure is an important issue and affects all 
manufacturers, especially those that are located farther from 
the port of Limon or the airports in San Jose. 
Infrastructure improvements are planned to accompany the 
implementation of CAFTA-DR as part of its complementary 
agenda. 
 
¶8.  Q5:  If (Costa Rica) is a partner in a free trade 
agreement or a beneficiary of a preference program such as 
AGOA, CBTPA, or ATPDEA, will this be sufficient for the 
country to remain competitive? 
 
A5:  As stated previously, many textile and apparel companies 
have already found their niche products, but still most rely 
on the preferences granted under CBI/CBTPA to compete against 
lower cost producers such as China.  This industry imports 
approximately 77 percent of its raw materials from the U.S. 
and exports most of its finished products to the U.S., which 
amounted to approximately USD 523 million in 2004.  Seventy 
seven percent of this amount was exported to the U.S. under 
the Special 807 program.  Industry experts see CAFTA-DR as 
absolutely necessary for the survival of the industry in 
Costa Rica and the rest of Central America.  If Costa Rica 
has not implemented CAFTA-DR before CBTPA expires in 
September 2008, it is very unlikely that the Costa Rican 
textile industry will survive with the exception of a few 
very special niche products and high-valued items. 
 
¶9.  Q6:  Overall, if not already addressed, does Post think 
that (Costa Rica) can be competitive in textiles and apparel 
exports with the end of global textiles and apparel quotas? 
 
A6: With respect to the threat due to low labor costs in 
China, the full effects of the expiration of global quotas 
have not yet been felt, and Costa Rica has not yet seen a 
large migration of textile jobs to places such as China. 
This is due in part to high efficiency, production of niche 
products, and the benefits of the Caribbean Basin Trade 
Preference Act (CBTPA).  However, industry experts told us 
that in 2003 CarterTex moved its operation from Costa Rica to 
Mexico and then later to China due to lower labor costs; this 
despite the fact that the factory in Costa Rica was much more 
efficient than either of those in Mexico or China.  If 
CAFTA-DR is not approved and the benefits of CBTPA go away, 
experts believe the Costa Rican textile industry will all but 
disappear.  The loss of 15,000 jobs from the textile industry 
in Costa Rica would affect a population five times that size 
when family members of workers are included. 
 
The only hope to maintain exports of textiles and employment 
in Costa Rica is to have some advantage in efficiency, labor, 
and/or trade preferences.  Benefits under CBTPA, unless 
extended, will expire in September 2008.  Costa Rican 
industry representatives are some of the most fervent 
supporters of CAFTA-DR because the agreement makes permanent 
the tariff-free exporting to the U.S. of their products. 
Costa Rican textile and apparel manufacturers will continue 
to be highly efficient and employ highly-skilled workers. 
However, it is difficult to see the Costa Rican textile 
industry being able to contend with the fierce competition 
from China without the advantage of CAFTA-DR. 
FRISBIE 
FRISBIE